Discharged
at an Unlawful, Non-judicial Tribunal
Discharged, but never arrested or charged in the state of Maryland -
yet was found "guilty" of committing a violation of a Maryland
state law by a panel committee of corporate/union officers held in the
separate state of Virginia who were not prosecutors (attorneys) and admittedly
did not know Maryland law.
The Denial of the Constitutional Right to Due Process
This unlawful, non-judicial tribunal was upheld by a federal court that
interpreted Maryland statutory law that held no Federal
Question, exceeding any and all authority that court held and acting
under the "color of law".
A federal court holds no jurisdiction
to determine whether an individual violated a state law and when it does,
and brands that individual as a criminal, it is, what it is, illegal and
an abuse of power.
Through the U.S. Maryland District Court, to the 4th Circuit Court of
Appeals and to the Supreme Court, Dan O'Shea was denied the 6th
Amendment right to due process -
"In all criminal prosecutions,
the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an
impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have
been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained
by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;
to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory
process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance
of Counsel for his defence." |
|
|